Hardback / gebonden
|
Engels
€ 171,50
- Vanaf €15,- geen verzendkosten.
- 30 dagen ruiltermijn voor fysieke producten
Omschrijving
At the core of this project is the question of how political action is possible without relying on essentialism. We do not need to be reminded of current discussions to understand that this is a timely project. O’Neil offers a sophisticated account of the concepts behind these debates which delivers to the reader both a panoramic display of political theory and a careful consideration of literary texts … The study brings a number of discourses into relation (biology, selfhood, economic etc.), arguing that they all follow a shared model of autopoiesis (or its rupture) around 1800. Considering the metaphor of birth at the study’s center, it is not surprising that the author aims to establish a connection between models of life’s origin and the political … Ultimately, however, for O’Neil the question is not only what happens in literature, but what we gain when engaging with it. O’Neil’s work is driven by the desire to open spaces for contingency in action in a world that is increasingly defined by automatization and repetition. In opening these spaces, literature plays a prominent role “as that which breaks with… social and cognitive routines” (21) … O’Neil’s engagement with Arendt’s concept of natality proves an impressively productive venue for, as the title states, Reading the Political in the Age of Goethe. It is also a powerful reminder that the end of politics might not deliver the best of possible worlds.
At the core of this project is the question of how political action is possible without relying on essentialism. We do not need to be reminded of current discussions to understand that this is a timely project. O’Neil offers a sophisticated account of the concepts behind these debates which delivers to the reader both a panoramic display of political theory and a careful consideration of literary texts … The study brings a number of discourses into relation (biology, selfhood, economic etc.), arguing that they all follow a shared model of autopoiesis (or its rupture) around 1800. Considering the metaphor of birth at the study’s center, it is not surprising that the author aims to establish a connection between models of life’s origin and the political … Ultimately, however, for O’Neil the question is not only what happens in literature, but what we gain when engaging with it. O’Neil’s work is driven by the desire to open spaces for contingency in action in a world that is increasingly defined by automatization and repetition. In opening these spaces, literature plays a prominent role “as that which breaks with… social and cognitive routines” (21) … O’Neil’s engagement with Arendt’s concept of natality proves an impressively productive venue for, as the title states, Reading the Political in the Age of Goethe. It is also a powerful reminder that the end of politics might not deliver the best of possible worlds.
Joseph O’Neil’s Figures of Natality offers an insightful and conceptually bold rethinking of the political as it is worked through in literary texts in the age of Goethe … This task is both worthwhile and timely, and the readings it produces are genuinely novel and interesting.
O'Neil connects Hannah Arendt’s concept of natality as the birth of the new and Carl Schmitt’s understanding of the sovereign decision as a basis for social organization in order to explore the nature of ‘the political.’ By focusing on natality, he can both use and challenge Arendt’s and Schmitt’s approaches, because natality points to the paradoxical conjoining of the reproductive and productive, or, in O’Neil’s version, the economic and the political. In his reading of major texts from German literature spanning the decades around 1800 that embrace this conjoining, O’Neil makes the deployment of a discourse and metaphors around birth fruitful for us today.
O’Neil’s is a dynamic, ingeniously crafted tour de force, which, by virtue of its range and diversity, succeeds in generating a web of hitherto unnoticed contextualizations. Its appeal will not be restricted to specialists already attuned to the intricacies of post-foundational discourse.
In Figures of Natality, O’Neil has provided a fascinating and lucid reflection on inception within the political, and hence on the relationship of birth to the state in literature and in theory. Scholars of the Age of Goethe and political theorists alike will benefit from this study of spontaneity, will, and life processes as crucial to understanding the political across an arc of two centuries. Highly recommended!
Joseph O’Neil provides an original and surprising insight into the poetics and politics of life around 1800.
Joseph D. O’Neil is Associate Professor in German Studies in the Department of Modern and Classical Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at the University of Kentucky, USA.
At the core of this project is the question of how political action is possible without relying on essentialism. We do not need to be reminded of current discussions to understand that this is a timely project. O’Neil offers a sophisticated account of the concepts behind these debates which delivers to the reader both a panoramic display of political theory and a careful consideration of literary texts … The study brings a number of discourses into relation (biology, selfhood, economic etc.), arguing that they all follow a shared model of autopoiesis (or its rupture) around 1800. Considering the metaphor of birth at the study’s center, it is not surprising that the author aims to establish a connection between models of life’s origin and the political … Ultimately, however, for O’Neil the question is not only what happens in literature, but what we gain when engaging with it. O’Neil’s work is driven by the desire to open spaces for contingency in action in a world that is increasingly defined by automatization and repetition. In opening these spaces, literature plays a prominent role “as that which breaks with… social and cognitive routines” (21) … O’Neil’s engagement with Arendt’s concept of natality proves an impressively productive venue for, as the title states, Reading the Political in the Age of Goethe. It is also a powerful reminder that the end of politics might not deliver the best of possible worlds.
Joseph O’Neil’s Figures of Natality offers an insightful and conceptually bold rethinking of the political as it is worked through in literary texts in the age of Goethe … This task is both worthwhile and timely, and the readings it produces are genuinely novel and interesting.
O'Neil connects Hannah Arendt’s concept of natality as the birth of the new and Carl Schmitt’s understanding of the sovereign decision as a basis for social organization in order to explore the nature of ‘the political.’ By focusing on natality, he can both use and challenge Arendt’s and Schmitt’s approaches, because natality points to the paradoxical conjoining of the reproductive and productive, or, in O’Neil’s version, the economic and the political. In his reading of major texts from German literature spanning the decades around 1800 that embrace this conjoining, O’Neil makes the deployment of a discourse and metaphors around birth fruitful for us today.
O’Neil’s is a dynamic, ingeniously crafted tour de force, which, by virtue of its range and diversity, succeeds in generating a web of hitherto unnoticed contextualizations. Its appeal will not be restricted to specialists already attuned to the intricacies of post-foundational discourse.
In Figures of Natality, O’Neil has provided a fascinating and lucid reflection on inception within the political, and hence on the relationship of birth to the state in literature and in theory. Scholars of the Age of Goethe and political theorists alike will benefit from this study of spontaneity, will, and life processes as crucial to understanding the political across an arc of two centuries. Highly recommended!
Joseph O’Neil provides an original and surprising insight into the poetics and politics of life around 1800.
Joseph D. O’Neil is Associate Professor in German Studies in the Department of Modern and Classical Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at the University of Kentucky, USA.